The film that features in the
Cannes Film Festival is about two Indian adivasi children. In the backdrop of the twittering birds,
shriek of cranes and rumbling of mining at a distance the two village
children are playing ‘gulli danda’ on a dusty village road.
Pedestrians, herdsmen,
cyclists and motorcyclists pass by them. It does not bother the two playing
lads. They go on with their game.
One motorcyclist is even
suspicious of the camera crew that is apparently shooting the playing boys. He
is the mining contractor.
In a while one of the boys is
called by his mother. He rides his bicycle and cycles out to reach his mother.
The other boy walks a distance to drink water.
He comes back but the other boy has yet to surface from his not so
distant home- he finally materializes but hurries down and upand down to the
pond to tend to his fishing net in the nearby pond. Eventually the left-alone
boy follows him and brings him back. The play starts again.
The play may have
interruptions and suspensions but it cannot be terminated. The play is metaphor
of life that must continue. The film is
almost without the spoken words. It is tacit, imagistic, metaphorical, and
poetic. It articulates itself through innocence of human presence and metaphor
of continuity.
How Satat (Continued) happened:
Satat happened accidentally-
Devi was in a tribal belt on the cusp of Madhya Pradesh – Orissa border doing a
communitarian documentary when he saw two village boys playing gulli danda. He
immediately had a sketchy narrative popping up with a blurred beginning, middle
and end. He talked to children and briefed them as to what he wanted. The film was shot endlessly through the glare of the
morning and mid day sun as the game went on. He told his cameraman Tarique
Mohammad that the film will go to Cannes and it did. So he found the characters and the story then
and there on the kuccha road; he made the non- actor Adivasi boys Sardar and
Balchand to act in an impromptu, sketchy and uncertain cultural venture. It
took him and his editor Ajmal Khan days and months to carve out a visual
narrative and to put together the right images at right places.
The Devi Prasad Mishra:
Known for his moral courage,
reclusive poetic habitat, and his disdain for literary machinations Devi won
two documentary projects from PSBT, and got National Award for one of them The Female Nude. He has almost completed a documentary
feature All This Because. It is about the loneliness of womanhood amid
the male dominated social prejudices, male gaze and male desires. It is about a
rebel woman poet Jyotsana who eventually committed suicide. He has almost completed
a feature film Mahabhinishkramana
( The Great Going Out), in shoe string
budget, wherein the non- actor Adivasis have acted. It busts the primary education system atrociously
designed for the remote rural children.
Having been awarded Sanskriti
Samman, Bharat Bhushan Smriti Samman, Sharad BilloreSamman and chosen by one
among thirteen faces by Illustrated Weekly of India for his poetry Devi follows
Cannes phenomenon avidly watching its official selections over the years, the
French Cultural Centre being the primary source. Even though he is not in Cannes
due to his pressing schedules he thinks that it certainly is an exciting hub
for filmmakers. Here the best
experiments and concepts in cinema, and
spirit of iconoclasm are exhibited left, right and centre, literally .
A film buff involved in running a film society
in his home town Allahabad he now lives in New Delhi with his artist wife Hem
Jyotika, and son Udbhav who is learning sculpture at Jamiaand making some real weird music, a small part of it Devi has used in his film
Satat.
Devi started as a poet, he
wants to live it out as a film maker, he quips.
He feels that the true
independent cinema is like writing poetry- you don’t have money, you are not
paid for your cultural production, you are always discouraged to do what you
desire to do, you are doubted as deviant, you don’t have a structured audience.
So even if he has three screenplays almost ready for full feature length films based
on his own three short stories he is sceptic about taking them to a pragmatic
end.
He feels that the present
phase of Hindi cinema has discovered the rawness of underclass dialect and
vernacular. But alas, except for Vishal and to a certain degree Dibakar no cinema
director has a philosophical and ideological and political mooring. The new
main stream Hindi cinema has generally ceased to be that stupid but it is violence centric, or libertarian - it is
forgetful of Ritwik and Satyajit Ray. It is Hollywood way where you have
enviable performances, gangsters, spectacular scenarios, smart camera work,
witticism at its best but no innate narrative. It only reflects the neo liberal
market spirit. The underclass is being portrayed as Lampat. “If we can
take a reference from contemporary cinema then what we need to be inspired from
is the cinema of Dardene Brothers(France ) or Kaurismaki Brothers(Finland) or
Mike Leigh(England)or AsgharFarhadi and JafarPanahi(Iran) or Nuri BilgeCeylan(Turkey),”
he avers.
Great....
ReplyDeleteFeature Films
Educaloxy?? Good stuff ! I found new work thanks to Educaloxy.
ReplyDelete